Tag Archives: Women

COVID and the Cost of Dehumanization

Masks and Objectifying Women
“Look me in the eyes.”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/farewell-high-waisted-skinny-jeans-the-low-rise-returns-11634135595?mod=trending_now_news_1

A strategy which I (Providentially) “stumbled” upon years ago for combating lustful passions was to look scantly clad ladies in the eyes we passed. This simple action transformed the woman from an object of desire into a living, breathing, and, yes, beautiful creature made in the image of God. The lesson: dehumanizing a person is easier when you refuse to look into their soul. 

The inverse is also true as I was reminded when the nearby headline popped up on my WSJ news feed. I am largely unconcerned with women’s fashions, but the photo accompanying the article drove home how difficult humanizing women has become in the era of COVID. A beautiful masked woman wearing dark sunglasses is easily “objectified” since to humanize her now requires considerable more discipline and effort. Since those features which would humanize her – her smile, her eyes, her disposition – are invisible, a man’s eyes are naturally drawn to those characteristics which are more obvious. Indeed, features which are intentionally obvious.

I recognized this feature of masks in two different contexts when the so-called pandemic first started. We travelled back to Ohio shortly after the death of George Floyd. When we hit Iowa and the number of black Americans we encountered increased exponentially, I realized that neither they nor I could discern our dispositions toward one another. All were friendly when we spoke but there was a timidity in initiating conversations for fear of rejection or hostility. 

On the return trip, we stopped by our old stomping in Boulder County, Colorado. The affluent, liberal, masked citizens of the county refused, without exception, to look me – the unmasked intruder – in the eye despite the fact that we were on a nature trail in bright sunlight and superb ventilation. I think some were angry toward my “cavalier” attitude, but others were embarrassed because my “mask-less-ness” pulled the veil from their cowardice. Many had exchanged existence for life, and the results were not pretty.

These are but three examples of the many problems with our fixation on masks. Even if masks have some impact upon transmissions of COVID-19, that impact is marginal and the costs of the mask mandate far outweigh these benefits.  Masks instill fear in many, but they also breed suspicion and hostility in mask-wearer and mandate resistor alike. The masks… well… mask the distinctly emotional and spiritual aspects of those passing us on the sidewalk or in aisles. That is, these hideous cloth aberrations conceal the very characteristics that make us human. 

All of which brings me to the point of this post. The time has come. Throw off your mask. Vanquish your fear of COVID. Look people in the eye and rejoice in the uniqueness of each person passes by. 

Defensive Training and Heresy on Adequate Handguns

I visited an indoor shooting range recently. An affluent couple walked in right before me, and the woman said, “I was in last week and shot a .22. I need to shoot something bigger today.” I observed the interaction of the woman with her husband and with the employee who was renting her the handgun. I regret not asking the woman, “Why do you need to shoot something bigger?”

Had I asked, I suspect the woman would have said something about needing a handgun for self-defense. Neither the woman, her husband, nor the salesman ever considered whether a .22 might be the best caliber for her to use as a self-defense handgun.

Assassination Attempt
Aftermath of Assassination Attempt on President Reagan

Before you react to violently to that last statement, consider the following: The woman was uncomfortable with handguns and lacked confidence in her ability to control a larger caliber. She had a slender build and wore tailored clothes which means she was not going to conceal a large handgun on her person. She might have concealed a Ruger LC380 in the outfit she was wearing, but I doubt it. What options does this leave her? A Ruger LCP or similarly sized .380? Perhaps, but I have shot them and more to the point, my adult daughter has shot them, and finds the recoil uncomfortable at best. A woman who is already intimidated by handguns is not going to be effective with a small .380.

However, she might be comfortable shooting the something like a Taurus PT22 Poly and thereby shoot it enough to get relatively proficient with it. She could also conceal this handgun with few adjustments to her wardrobe. Put bluntly, the handgun fits her skills and lifestyle and… don’t start swearing yet… provides adequate protection for most situations.

How can I make that last statement with a straight face? Odds are that if this woman is attacked it will be a single attacker in close quarters. The PT22 is perfectly capable of consistent head shots at 7 to 10 yards. Further, even a relatively weak user can fire it with one hand, a distinct advantage when one is fending off an attacker with the other hand.

But the .22 is an inferior caliber! Certainly, but shots to the head, preferably, or chest or groin or either femoral artery will have a significant deterrent effect. Don’t believe me, see for yourself what a .22 can do; watch John Hinckley’s assignation attempt of President Reagan. What do you observe in the wake of his violent spree? Three guys down and the President nearly killed.

All this to get to this challenge to defensive firearm trainers: Are you  molding your clients to fit your training? That is a common temptation and a disservice to our clients. We should be tailoring our training to our clients.  As our clients’ skill levels progress, we can provide more effective methods. Until then, let us not sacrifice the good for the best.